A genuine dispute about the debt
The common one, and the bar is lower than people expect. You do not have to prove you will win the dispute. The test, from Eyota Pty Ltd v Hanave Pty Ltd, is a plausible contention requiring investigation - much the same idea as a serious question to be tried - and the court will not try to resolve the dispute itself on the application. What the bar being low does not mean is that saying so is enough. The same case is clear that a patently feeble legal argument, or an assertion of facts unsupported by evidence, does not get there. Nor does a dispute manufactured on day 19: one raised in writing months earlier reads very differently.







